🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to enact a law lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "based on strong research".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous online content suggests that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and suitable for children," stated a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to copy the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, further nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this global debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less content to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.